September 2018 Blog | Ft. Lauderdale Criminal Defense Lawyer

Featured Article

What Is Civil Asset Forfeiture? Sep 21

Civil asset forfeiture allows police officials to seize assets from individuals who are suspected of committing a crime. You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to have your property taken. The Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act states that law enforcement must have ...

What Is Considered Police Misconduct? Sep 17
A police officer’s duty is to protect people and property by responding to calls, enforcing the law, making arrests, issuing citations, and testifying ...
View More

Our Victories

Not Guilty, Acquitted at Trial Aggravated Battery with a Deadly Weapon

Outcome: Client was alleged to have used his vehicle to strike victim, and there was video of the incident which could have been interpreted to actually show the crime. The state was offering significant prison time before trial. By meticulous planning and strategic cross-examination to expose the motives and fabrications by the alleged victim, and an eyewitness in support of the alleged victim, Rudenberg & Glasser convinced a jury to acquit the client and avoid a mandatory long prison sentence.
Domestic Violence
Outcome: Rudenberg & Glasser went to trial and were able to show during cross-examination that the alleged victim was the aggressor and that the client acted in self-defense. The jury returned a not guilty verdict almost immediately following trial.
Domestic Violence With 911 Call and Pictures
Outcome: Rudenberg & Glasser took the case to trial after fleshing out inconsistencies in the alleged victim's account. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty and the client's unblemished record was preserved.
False Arrest

Outcome: Attorney Glasser was able to show with video footage that his client did not commit the alleged offense and furthermore, the police officer who ordered his arrest was negligent in his investigation and improperly supervised.

Read more about this story on the Sun Sentinel.
Probation Only Federal Conspiracy to Commit Mail & Wire Fraud

Outcome: Through compelling sentencing memorandum and passionate oral argument, Rudenberg & Glasser were able to convince the federal court judge to sentence their client to treatment for substance abuse, and no incarceration, even though the client had a lengthy criminal history and the Government was seeking prison time.
Felony DUI: Client was in an Accident and Left the Scene
Outcome: Rudenberg & Glasser filed a compelling motion to suppress evidence based on law enforcement's actions during the investigation. Rudenberg & Glasser were able to persuade the prosecutor prior to the motion to suppress hearing that the charge should be broken down from a felony to a misdemeanor and the client was offered probation instead of the previously sought prison sentence.
Final Injunction Hearing
Outcome: Client desperately needed to avoid a final injunction on his record. Rudenberg & Glasser defended him at the hearing and proved that the Petitioner was not in fear for her safety. The judge dismissed the injunction.
First-Degree Misdemeanor: Resisting Police Officer Without Violence
Outcome: Mr. Rudenberg presented evidence that the police officer’s version of events was not credible, and that accusations were made to justify excessive use of force by police officer. Jury returned a verdict of not guilty in less than five minutes.
First-Degree Misdemeanors: DUI & Possession of Cannabis
Outcome: Mr. Rudenberg won a motion arguing the DUI checkpoint was conducted in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and the Judge entered an order suppressing all evidence. Case was dropped by the State, and client avoided a mandatory conviction for DUI, as well as mandatory fines and license suspensions.
$250,000 Pre-Trial Personal Injury

Outcome: Client was injured by a malfunctioning door, requiring stitches and leaving a scar on client's knee. There were limited medical bills and no surgeries, but through extremely challenging and successful negotiations, Rudenberg & Glasser were able to secure a settlement of $250,000.

What Our Clients Are Saying

We go above and beyond to be there for clients to provide them with the best outcome possible.

“THE BEST ATTORNEY”
A. Ariel
“Professional, Reliable and Supportive”
DG
“You were so very wonderful in court.”
P.M.
“If I would need your service in the future I will definitely reach out to you again no matter the distance.”
A.M.
“I would recommend them to anyone that’s looking for someone that really cares!”
R.N.
“Their great efforts got us the most unexpected, but amazing outcome for what we were up against.”
M.C.
“The amount of respect and empathy Attorney Rudenberg has for his clients can not be described in words.”
C J
“They will give you honest, truthful, realistic counsel and they will fight hard for you; as they did for me.”
Donovan
“It's nice to know that you actually cared and it didn't seem like this case was just another folder.”
John J.
“They Were There with Me Every Step of the Way”
Dan
“I’ve used Mike and Eric for my cases since 2012.”
J.R
“Proved to be the best legal team there is! They not only helped me avoid jail time, but got my probation terminated the same day!”
Dallas B.
“Provided a High Level of Support & Skill”
DUI Client
“Great results, compassionate service, and extremely professional.”
C.C.
“Michael jumped through hoops to give me the defense I deserved and I will always be grateful. Michael and Eric are not just Lawyers, they are friends and will look out for your best interest!”
G.W.

Read Client Reviews